All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=712458

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgwrXeogkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgwobgpgoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982021925328318992

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : enne
  Commit : e594588348ea08e4cdc15dc587efa5645db5023e
  Date   : Fri Apr 14 07:42:34 2017
  Subject: Back PaintRecord with PaintOpBuffer instead of SkPicture

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.paint
  Metric       : paint-offset-changes/paint-offset-changes
  Change       : 19.86% | 160.376083333 -> 192.227416667

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464695      160.376 +- 5.17637      6      good
chromium@464699      160.548 +- 3.86915      6      good
chromium@464700      167.535 +- 3.43364      6      good
chromium@464701      193.572 +- 3.8818       6      bad       <--
chromium@464702      192.326 +- 3.25081      6      bad
chromium@464709      196.024 +- 15.5578      6      bad
chromium@464722      192.227 +- 10.9069      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982021925328318992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6153117390864384


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!