New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 712457 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

85.1% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 464718:464749

Project Member Reported by benhenry@google.com, Apr 17 2017

Issue description

bisect
 

Comment 1 by benhenry@google.com, Apr 17 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=712457

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgwqSiswoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___ruten.com.tw_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464717      542.81 +- 714.987       21      good
chromium@464749      546.454 +- 639.599      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...ruten.com.tw. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982022049895212880

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6424241966153728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___ruten.com.tw_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464717      560.987 +- 612.916      21      good
chromium@464749      532.429 +- 657.573      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...ruten.com.tw. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982016484409589296

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6424241966153728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___ruten.com.tw_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464717      561.114 +- 614.14       21      good
chromium@464749      571.294 +- 669.804      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...ruten.com.tw. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981918343131949056

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6424241966153728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___ruten.com.tw_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464717      584.917 +- 632.491      21      good
chromium@464749      546.494 +- 640.357      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...ruten.com.tw. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981277705221093648

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6424241966153728


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 10 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 19 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment