New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 712401 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
inactive
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

36.9%-456.1% regression in memory.top_10_mobile_stress at 464747:464856

Project Member Reported by benhenry@google.com, Apr 17 2017

Issue description

Graphs to come.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017

Cc: aelias@chromium.org
Owner: aelias@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author aelias@chromium.org ===

Hi aelias@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : aelias
  Commit : e678aa49f3fbb21132296a1356239c79d8db276a
  Date   : Fri Apr 14 22:41:04 2017
  Subject: Decouple some graphics-related IsLowEndDevice() policies for 1GB devices.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_mobile
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur
  Change       : 456.07% | 459832.0 -> 2556984.0

Revision             Result              N
chromium@464807      459832 +- 0.0       6      good
chromium@464811      459832 +- 0.0       6      good
chromium@464812      459832 +- 0.0       6      good
chromium@464813      2556984 +- 0.0      6      bad       <--
chromium@464814      2556984 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@464820      2556984 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@464832      2556984 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@464856      2556984 +- 0.0      6      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982025544688791264

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5889093403148288


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by aelias@chromium.org, Apr 18 2017

Cc: dalecur...@chromium.org
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This is a media-related benchmark, and this patch reverted a portion of https://codereview.chromium.org/2333983002 and indeed the memory returns to exactly the level that it was in September 2016.  This change is also associated with a media-related usability improvement (they autoplay) so the memory is not simply being wasted.  So I'll WontFix as working as intended.

Sign in to add a comment