New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 712223 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.1%-29.3% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic at 464141:464329

Project Member Reported by hablich@chromium.org, Apr 17 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 17 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      182.103 +- 11.2791      21      good
chromium@464329      180.766 +- 8.30266      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982047912387605168

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5868440247599104


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017

Cc: horo@chromium.org
Owner: horo@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author horo@chromium.org ===

Hi horo@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : horo
  Commit : cb6838f5badc8c2df03f387f4aa726629214179a
  Date   : Thu Apr 13 07:27:00 2017
  Subject: Make no-location redirect response to be "opaque redirect" when redirect mode is manual.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google
  Change       : 1.40% | 182.166642857 -> 179.756714286

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      182.167 +- 8.91331      14      good
chromium@464259      181.819 +- 10.8477      21      good
chromium@464294      182.195 +- 13.9519      21      good
chromium@464310      181.7 +- 8.11359        21      good
chromium@464321      181.869 +- 4.33561      9       good
chromium@464325      182.447 +- 8.31648      14      good
chromium@464328      182.398 +- 4.37671      9       good
chromium@464329      179.757 +- 6.0124       14      bad       <--

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982035365159237712

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5868440247599104


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : V8 C++:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      217.569 +- 11.8005      21      good
chromium@464329      218.393 +- 14.9956      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981981645074548752

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5223949803192320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      181.292 +- 10.8703      21      good
chromium@464329      181.178 +- 7.76535      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981981661484691104

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313315724591104


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : V8 C++:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      219.031 +- 29.396       21      good
chromium@464329      221.909 +- 16.4497      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981971196423507040

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5223949803192320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 18 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      181.121 +- 8.37225      21      good
chromium@464329      181.207 +- 9.49914      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981971193034708592

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313315724591104


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463519      181.178 +- 14.8668      21      good
chromium@464524      182.196 +- 14.1586      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981928821586403760

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5780718157824000


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@463519      182.093 +- 18.2259      21      good
chromium@464524      182.306 +- 7.50627      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981914573386729424

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5780718157824000


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 18 by habl...@google.com, Apr 19 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Project Member

Comment 21 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : speedometer
  Metric       : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464140      0.735646 +- 0.246178      21      good
chromium@464246      0.739147 +- 0.254624      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests speedometer

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981869209422567200

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5223949803192320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 22 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 19 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : speedometer
  Metric       : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464140      0.727133 +- 0.133385      21      good
chromium@464246      0.737361 +- 0.2538        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests speedometer

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981869206768230048

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313315724591104


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 24 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 20 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: linux_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : speedometer
  Metric       : benchmark_duration/benchmark_duration

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@464140      0.773943 +- 0.365435      21      good
chromium@464246      0.765124 +- 0.148503      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests speedometer

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981812524591782336

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5780718157824000


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 27 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      181.338 +- 12.2359      21      good
chromium@464329      182.934 +- 20.0274      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981227503252327904

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5223949803192320


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 28 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 26 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      182.175 +- 11.0502      21      good
chromium@464329      182.164 +- 8.96362      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981227499232495824

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313315724591104


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 30 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 27 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Parse:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@464184      181.458 +- 8.79853      21      good
chromium@464329      181.652 +- 8.10826      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981172331153260576

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5780718157824000


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment