New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 711870 link

Starred by 3 users
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
crouleau@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

6.8% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 461819:461967

Project Member Reported by crouleau@chromium.org, Apr 15 2017 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by crouleau@chromium.org, Apr 15 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=711870

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg_MaViwsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 15 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_impact/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@461818      165.579 +- 65.1684      21      good
chromium@461967      163.249 +- 64.5342      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982282875544519072

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5879966731862016


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 15 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_impact/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@461818      169.156 +- 20.8368      21      good
chromium@461967      169.015 +- 16.2862      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982277019538310944

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5879966731862016


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 16 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_impact/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@461818      166.52 +- 38.4608       21      good
chromium@461967      169.801 +- 14.4568      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982182582492422048

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5879966731862016


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : energy_impact/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@461818      169.343 +- 12.0482      21      good
chromium@461967      168.208 +- 11.9871      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981542032369642688

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5879966731862016


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by dtapu...@chromium.org, Oct 30 2017

Components: Internals>Media

Comment 11 by crouleau@chromium.org, Nov 14 2017

Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.
►

Sign in to add a comment