New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 711867 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Cc:
crouleau@chromium.org
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

300% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 463155:463170

Project Member Reported by crouleau@chromium.org, Apr 15 2017 
processes delta went way up, so that means that there is an extra process running after the tests.

Comment 1 by crouleau@chromium.org, Apr 15 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=711867

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDggpb2-AkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 15 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : processes_delta/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@463154      -0.190476 +- 1.79947      21      good
chromium@463170      -0.380952 +- 2.22539      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982282951622962880

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5832294205489152


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 15 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : processes_delta/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result          N
chromium@463154      1.0 +- 0.0      21      good
chromium@463170      1.0 +- 0.0      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982277022224147952

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5832294205489152


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 16 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : processes_delta/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result          N
chromium@463154      1.0 +- 0.0      21      good
chromium@463170      1.0 +- 0.0      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982178814344503568

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5832294205489152


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 23 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.tough_video_cases
  Metric       : processes_delta/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4_canvas_true

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@463154      -0.142857 +- 1.60357      21      good
chromium@463170      -0.047619 +- 0.9759       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4.canvas.true media.tough_video_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981538023233314752

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5832294205489152


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 10 by dtapu...@chromium.org, Oct 30 2017

Components: Internals>Media

Comment 11 by crouleau@chromium.org, Nov 14 2017

Labels: Performance-Media
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
WontFix. Bisect didn't work and bug is stale.
►

Sign in to add a comment