Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
6.8%-129.4% regression in media.tough_video_cases_extra at 464185:464369 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThis should be a result of my change that fixed this benchmark: https://codereview.chromium.org/2813383002/
,
Apr 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982283050323377568
,
Apr 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.tough_video_cases_extra Metric : seek/video.html?src_tulip2.ogv Revision Result N chromium@464227 12.6638 +- 2.41526 21 good chromium@464322 20.9905 +- 43.1447 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogv media.tough_video_cases_extra Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982283050323377568 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4965527123918848 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982277023937767696
,
Apr 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.tough_video_cases_extra Metric : seek/video.html?src_tulip2.ogv Revision Result N chromium@464227 12.8964 +- 2.15581 21 good chromium@464322 19.4481 +- 37.3279 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.ogv media.tough_video_cases_extra Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982277023937767696 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4965527123918848 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982182586600949280
,
Apr 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : crouleau Commit : 6a48a45ac9c3138e306f19df0b3fc1974ffe33ec Date : Thu Apr 13 03:55:49 2017 Subject: Do not play the whole media file before seeking. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.tough_video_cases_extra Metric : seek/video.html?src_crowd720_vp9.webm Change : 40.06% | 42.2633333333 -> 59.1933333333 Revision Result N chromium@464227 42.2633 +- 3.89275 6 good chromium@464275 42.4408 +- 3.02087 6 good chromium@464287 43.8692 +- 4.67404 6 good chromium@464288 64.4317 +- 17.0856 6 bad <-- chromium@464289 66.3275 +- 14.7559 6 bad chromium@464290 66.7225 +- 15.8314 6 bad chromium@464293 67.6933 +- 11.9084 6 bad chromium@464299 60.3233 +- 16.2542 6 bad chromium@464322 59.1933 +- 16.4483 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd720.vp9.webm media.tough_video_cases_extra Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982182586600949280 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4965527123918848 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by crouleau@chromium.org
, Apr 15 2017