All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=711265

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgnLiBrgsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982428550518652944

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ehmaldonado@chromium.org ===

Hi ehmaldonado@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : ehmaldonado
  Commit : 967024f84d0fc6ada6db5bace52e7b6ca027669b
  Date   : Tue Nov 08 17:28:45 2016
  Subject: Update telemetry benchmark to stress-test WebRTC.

Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : webrtc.stress
  Metric       : cpu_utilization/cpu_utilization_gpu
  Change       : 57.46% | 4.40688295198 -> 6.93917208568

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@430638      4.40688 +- 1.39078       6      good
chromium@430641      4.37562 +- 0.779748      6      good
chromium@430642      4.41942 +- 0.328305      6      good
chromium@430643      7.19893 +- 0.97062       6      bad       <--
chromium@430644      7.52043 +- 1.72153       6      bad
chromium@430649      7.45647 +- 2.26241       6      bad
chromium@430660      6.93917 +- 0.514539      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests webrtc.stress

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982428550518652944

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6411625164177408


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

This was intended.