Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.6% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 461311:461321 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982662062529584448
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Metric : queueing_durations/queueing_durations Revision Result N chromium@461310 0.0646287 +- 0.00451533 21 good chromium@461321 0.0650794 +- 0.00387275 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982662062529584448 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5211147969495040 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 12 2017
Nothing actionable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Apr 10 2017