New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 710220 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

8.6% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 461311:461321

Project Member Reported by m...@chromium.org, Apr 10 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org, Apr 10 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=710220

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgvJHYugkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases
  Metric       : queueing_durations/queueing_durations

Revision             Result                       N
chromium@461310      0.0646287 +- 0.00451533      21      good
chromium@461321      0.0650794 +- 0.00387275      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982662062529584448

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5211147969495040


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by m...@chromium.org, Apr 12 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Nothing actionable.

Sign in to add a comment