Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
64.9% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR at 462745:462809 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982663839074571792
,
Apr 11 2017
Data is volatile. Ignoring alert.
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___elmundo.es_ Revision Result N chromium@462744 612.567 +- 596.96 21 good chromium@462809 608.819 +- 240.037 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...elmundo.es. page_cycler_v2.intl_es_fr_pt-BR Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982663839074571792 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5327433135292416 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Apr 10 2017