Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
96.3% regression in media.tough_video_cases at 458882:459005 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSeems valid.
,
Apr 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982674875235526368
,
Apr 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.tough_video_cases Metric : time_to_play/video.html?src_garden2_10s.mp4 Revision Result N chromium@458881 471.307 +- 641.985 21 good chromium@459005 492.232 +- 805.571 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.garden2.10s.mp4 media.tough_video_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982674875235526368 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5901933329514496 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 10 2017
Bisect results and original graphs appear to show this is actually in the noise. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by wolenetz@chromium.org
, Apr 10 2017