Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 461330:461337 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982929717183061024
,
Apr 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background_search/background_search_google Revision Result N chromium@461329 4600247 +- 79445.1 21 good chromium@461337 4593371 +- 79768.8 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=background.search.google system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982929717183061024 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5237551817818112 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 10 2017
Memory usage is gradually increasing, but it's not clear there is any particular change associated with it. Perhaps something in the lab environment?
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651518092087408 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Apr 7 2017