Flash not working in Incognito mode
Reported by
andrewim...@gmail.com,
Apr 6 2017
|
|||||||||||
Issue descriptionUserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/57.0.2987.133 Safari/537.36 Example URL: http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ Steps to reproduce the problem: 1. With Flash enabled, browse to http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ 2. A small box will display the version of Flash installed using the Flash Player (You have version 25,0,0,127 installed). 3. Open a new Incognito window and browse to: http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ 4. A puzzle piece is displayed where the Flash version should be listed. 5. Click on the puzzle piece - a prompt will appear stating that the web site wants to "Run Flash". 6. Click "Allow" 7. Page reloads and only displays the puzzle piece. What is the expected behavior? 1. In the new Incognito window, Flash content should display automatically if enabled. 2. Clicking on the "Allow" button should enable Flash content if it's not enabled. What went wrong? 1. It's not displaying Flash content when viewed in an Incognito windows. 2. Clicking on the "Allow" button did not enable the Flash content. Attached screenshot shows what I'm seeing. Does it occur on multiple sites: Yes Is it a problem with a plugin? No Did this work before? N/A Does this work in other browsers? Yes Chrome version: 57.0.2987.133 Channel: stable OS Version: 6.1 (Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2) Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 25.0 r0
,
Apr 7 2017
Hi, Have you tried it on another machine? It works fine for me and after I click 'Allow' in Incognito, it shows flash version.
,
Apr 7 2017
Yes, I filed the report from a different computer than where it was first reported. I'll test again on a third to confirm. I'm assuming you're using the same version?
,
Apr 9 2017
Yes, I tried it on 3 Windows 10 (64 bit) machines with Chrome 57.0.2987.133 and all 3 were OK.
,
Apr 12 2017
As per your comment #3, could you please update the thread with the latest behavior. Thanks!
,
May 5 2017
,
Oct 6 2017
I have the same issue with Chrome 61.0.3163.100 (Official Build) (64-bit) on Linux (Debian 9.1 x64). I have explicitly allowed flash and it still doesn't load (only happens in incognito windows).
,
Oct 8 2017
Hi, I've tried it on two machines, both Windows 10 x64. On one, it didn't happen. On the other one flash does not get enabled. I've enabled flash in the settings and set it to 'allow site to run flash', but it still shows the flash plugin blocked both in normal and incognito mode. tkent@, can you help on this?
,
Oct 9 2017
,
Apr 17 2018
andrewimutch@, Can you still reproduce the error. It seems to be fixed.
,
Apr 17 2018
,
Apr 18 2018
Still seeing it with the latest release: Version 66.0.3359.117 (Official Build) (64-bit) 1. Open an Incognito window 2. Browse to http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/about/ 3. Right-click on puzzle piece icon and select "Enable Flash" 4. Click "Allow" for "Run Flash" dialog 5. Reload page - Flash does not run Alternatively, browse here in Incognito mode: https://www.whatismybrowser.com/detect/is-flash-installed It reports "Flash is disabled or not installed in this browser"
,
Apr 18 2018
Thank you for providing more feedback. Adding the requester to the cc list. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Apr 19 2018
Tested the issue on chrome version 67.0.3359.117 using Windows-10 with steps mentioned below: 1) Launched chrome version and navigated to URL: http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/about/ 2) Clicked on puzzle like image and clicked on enable flash and clicked on "Allow" 3) Now opened Incognito mode and entered URL: http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/about/, licked on puzzle like image and clicked on enable flash and clicked on "Allow" 4) Clicked on secure chip, able to see Flash as "Allow" in combo box, reloaded the page and again checked the secure chip, able to flash in "Allow" @Reporter: Please find the attached screencast for your reference and let us know if we missed anything in verifying the issue, provide your feedback on it which help in further triaging it in better way. Thanks!
,
Apr 20 2018
I also couldn't reproduce it on two computers.
,
Sep 10
I'm able to reproduce this issue *with my usual profile* (and have been able to for a while), but I'm unable to reproduce it if I generate a fresh profile by running chrome with the flag `--user-data-dir=/tmp/blankslate` (where `/tmp/blankslate/` doesn't exist beforehand). Here's my version info from `chrome://version`: Google Chrome 68.0.3440.84 (Official Build) (64-bit) Revision 520a5c14b858e4b1441dd2d3bab9bc745911a23b-refs/branch-heads/3440@{#774} OS Linux JavaScript V8 6.8.275.24 Flash 30.0.0.154 /home/na/.config/google-chrome/PepperFlash/30.0.0.154/libpepflashplayer.so rhalavati: Can you think of anything that changed between October 8th when you were able to reproduce the issue, and April 17th when you weren't? While I'm not about to upload my profile for folks to poke at, if anyone has any hypotheses, or good ways to debug what's going on, I'm happy to poke around to see if I can help narrow it down.
,
Sep 10
I've got a solid reproduction now. For me, it looks like the issue was that I had an entry in `profile.content_settings.exceptions.plugins` that looked like:
```
"*,*":{
"per_resource": {
"adobe-flash-player": 1
}
}
```
I can consistently reproduce the reported issue by pre-setting that value in the Preferences file (e.g. by running `mkdir -p blankslate/Default && echo '{"profile":{"content_settings":{"exceptions":{"plugins":{"*,*":{"per_resource":{"adobe-flash-player":1}}}}}}}' > blankslate/Default/Preferences` before `google-chrome-stable --user-data-dir=/tmp/chromescience/blankslate/`). Unfortunately, I've got no idea how I managed to add a content exception for "*,*"
,
Sep 11
I can't think of any change between Oct 8 and Apr 17, and I cannot reproduce it again! I am not familiar with the content settings file, and I think manually modifying it may result in unexpected errors, is it possible to do it through settings page? (Also note that Flash permissions are more ephemeral from 69). Adding bbudge@ and raymes@ as they may know more about the issue.
,
Sep 13
Given that flash settings are now ephemeral this is probably a non-issue. But assigning to dullweber to confirm.
,
Sep 13
The bug states that Flash cannot be enabled at all. The ephemeral storage just effects keeping the permission after it is enabled.
,
Sep 13
The setting looks like a default content setting but default content settings are stored in "default_content_setting_values" and not the "exceptions" preference. I'm not sure how you could have gotten that entry but there might be a conflict between the default setting and your *,* entry.
"default_content_setting_values": {
"automatic_downloads": 3,
"images": 1,
"javascript": 1,
"media_stream_camera": 1,
"notifications": 2,
"plugins": 5,
"popups": 2
},
As of Chrome 69 this probably doesn't matter anymore because flash settings are not persisted. Could you check if the bug still reproduces on 69?
,
Sep 14
I'm no longer able to reproduce the bug with Chrome 69; flash works fine in incognito even with the strange *,* entry added to Preferences. If andrewimutch@'s broken flash was caused by the same thing, then it looks like this isn't a problem any more. I've still got no idea how I managed to create that entry. I couldn't find any sign of it in the regular preferences UI, and I don't remember making a change like that manually (which I suspect I *would* remember, given the fight I had with sync trying to remove it manually). According to profile.created_by_version, this profile has been around since Chrome 30 (late 2013, according to wikipedia), so the problematic entry probably worked its way in sometime in the past, and just got carried forward until it ran into this bug.
,
Sep 17
Great, thanks for verifying. I guess we can mark this as fixed. I also suspect that this is caused by old data that wasn't migrated at some point or an old bug that allowed the creation of this setting. |
|||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||
Comment 1 by andrewim...@gmail.com
, Apr 6 2017