Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
214.3% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru at 451329:460623 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 5 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983134983418151296
,
Apr 6 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___ru.wikipedia.org_ To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...ru.wikipedia.org. page_cycler_v2.intl_hi_ru Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983134983418151296 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5840727226974208 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Apr 5 2017