New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 708567 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

10.5%-53.6% regression in blink_perf.canvas at 461120:461312

Project Member Reported by pmeenan@chromium.org, Apr 5 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.canvas
  Metric       : draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d/draw-dynamic-webgl-to-hw-accelerated-canvas-2d

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@461146      5117.52 +- 233.238      21      good
chromium@461254      5149.24 +- 162.547      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.canvas

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983144057497270128

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6742912823459840


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment