Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
54.8% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic at 460692:460947 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Apr 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983351096486079520
,
Apr 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_sum/browse_media/browse_media_youtube Revision Result N chromium@460691 54.1047 +- 47.028 21 good chromium@460947 53.3463 +- 35.222 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.youtube v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983351096486079520 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6435082316808192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
May 12 2017
,
Jul 21 2017
,
Jul 24 2017
The graph recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ulan@google.com
, Apr 3 2017