Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
30.6% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic at 458715:458826 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983571430185767504
,
Mar 31 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic Metric : GC:duration_avg/browse_search/browse_search_google_india Revision Result N chromium@458714 10.3981 +- 3.83515 21 good chromium@458826 9.98067 +- 2.85722 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google.india v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983571430185767504 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6729451993300992 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 3 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org
, Mar 31 2017