Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
77.4% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic at 459000:459057 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983571461540482112
,
Apr 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : GC:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_qq Revision Result N chromium@458999 53.3556 +- 31.2358 21 good chromium@459057 56.4387 +- 18.9742 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.qq v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983571461540482112 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833431251943424 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 3 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org
, Mar 31 2017