Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic at 460288:460335 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983571507967031712
,
Apr 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : IC:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983571507967031712 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5281096276639744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 5 2017
Mythri, is this something real? If not, feel free to WontFix.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624493975798016
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Metric : IC:duration_avg/browse_social/browse_social_facebook To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.social.facebook v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_classic Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982624493975798016 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5281096276639744 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 18 2017
I think these "regressions" are because we moved the benchmarks to the actual classic configuration after this cl: https://codereview.chromium.org/2786633002/. Earlier it was using the turbo configuration. Marking it as wont fix. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org
, Mar 31 2017