New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 706948 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 711039



Sign in to add a comment

42.4%-89.8% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 459565:459640

Project Member Reported by lanwei@chromium.org, Mar 30 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 31 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : typed-array-construct-from-array/typed-array-construct-from-array

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@459564      20.3417 +- 1.00462      21      good
chromium@459640      20.3504 +- 1.29043      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983670422751310112

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5309855243436032


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Blockedon: 711039
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : typed-array-construct-from-typed/typed-array-construct-from-typed

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@459564      205.015 +- 26.2659      21      good
chromium@459640      203.529 +- 37.7745      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982417373372142432

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 14 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : typed-array-construct-from-typed/typed-array-construct-from-typed

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@459564      224.295 +- 20.6451      21      good
chromium@459640      226.693 +- 12.9044      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982394044994712544

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 15 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : typed-array-construct-from-array/typed-array-construct-from-array

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@459564      18.0365 +- 1.40412      21      good
chromium@459640      17.0992 +- 7.37754      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982280796192362256

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 22 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to continue

Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either
good or bad.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : blink_perf.bindings
  Metric       : typed-array-construct-from-typed/typed-array-construct-from-typed

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@459564      205.92 +- 28.7152       21      good
chromium@459602      207.244 +- 36.23        21      unknown
chromium@459640      208.571 +- 56.0917      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981622517646581952

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment