Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
42.4%-89.8% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 459565:459640 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983670422751310112
,
Mar 31 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : typed-array-construct-from-array/typed-array-construct-from-array Revision Result N chromium@459564 20.3417 +- 1.00462 21 good chromium@459640 20.3504 +- 1.29043 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983670422751310112 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5309855243436032 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620264549688944
,
Apr 13 2017
,
Apr 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982417373372142432
,
Apr 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : typed-array-construct-from-typed/typed-array-construct-from-typed Revision Result N chromium@459564 205.015 +- 26.2659 21 good chromium@459640 203.529 +- 37.7745 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982417373372142432 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982394044994712544
,
Apr 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : typed-array-construct-from-typed/typed-array-construct-from-typed Revision Result N chromium@459564 224.295 +- 20.6451 21 good chromium@459640 226.693 +- 12.9044 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982394044994712544 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982280796192362256
,
Apr 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : typed-array-construct-from-array/typed-array-construct-from-array Revision Result N chromium@459564 18.0365 +- 1.40412 21 good chromium@459640 17.0992 +- 7.37754 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982280796192362256 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981622517646581952
,
Apr 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to continue Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either good or bad. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : typed-array-construct-from-typed/typed-array-construct-from-typed Revision Result N chromium@459564 205.92 +- 28.7152 21 good chromium@459602 207.244 +- 36.23 21 unknown chromium@459640 208.571 +- 56.0917 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981622517646581952 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5800441520062464 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org
, Mar 30 2017