Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
96.8% regression in v8.mobile_infinite_scroll_tbmv2 at 460001:460059 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983670523818242592
,
Mar 31 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.mobile_infinite_scroll_tbmv2 Metric : v8-gc-scavenger_max/facebook To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=facebook v8.mobile_infinite_scroll_tbmv2 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983670523818242592 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5681006989803520 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982611692598220416
,
Apr 13 2017
The ref moved in each case roughly the same amount, I don't think this is a real regression.
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org
, Mar 30 2017