Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
56.1%-100.4% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he at 459663:459675 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983674628680934288
,
Mar 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.islamweb.net_ Revision Result N chromium@459664 754.24 +- 4341.64 21 good chromium@459675 686.055 +- 3112.14 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.islamweb.net. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983674628680934288 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5513739488460800 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982612118667179056
,
Apr 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982417109207845392
,
Apr 13 2017
,
Apr 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.islamweb.net_ Revision Result N chromium@459664 618.566 +- 2140.6 21 good chromium@459675 614.791 +- 2224.54 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.islamweb.net. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982417109207845392 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776537476923392 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982409140590504832
,
Apr 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.islamweb.net_ Revision Result N chromium@459664 628.897 +- 2087.77 21 good chromium@459675 654.3 +- 2438.65 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.islamweb.net. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982409140590504832 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776537476923392 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982310997499534880
,
Apr 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.cnn.com Revision Result N chromium@459662 2048.27 +- 7300.92 21 good chromium@459674 1705.55 +- 4225.43 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.cnn.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982310997499534880 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776537476923392 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981669957925834912
,
Apr 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___farsnews.com_ Revision Result N chromium@459662 434.026 +- 931.564 21 good chromium@459674 401.392 +- 478.428 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...farsnews.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8981669957925834912 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776537476923392 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org
, Mar 30 2017