Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.3%-143.3% regression in page_cycler_v2.typical_25 at 459637:459662 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983675308171449840
,
Mar 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sugoi Commit : 7ae2ba1892a8b4dee8d7c231ac0e0fbe66588912 Date : Sat Mar 25 13:59:47 2017 Subject: Solving some telemetry tests' slowness Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___www.danawa.com_ Change : 99.51% | 670.726111112 -> 1338.13483333 Revision Result N chromium@459639 670.726 +- 547.508 9 good chromium@459646 643.924 +- 280.524 9 good chromium@459650 651.141 +- 433.256 9 good chromium@459651 2046.48 +- 4004.26 6 bad <-- chromium@459652 1827.47 +- 1583.16 6 bad chromium@459653 1338.13 +- 1181.98 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.danawa.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983675308171449840 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5775108649517056 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org
, Mar 30 2017