Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1%-1.7% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 459451:459597 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983677739632607568
,
Mar 31 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author verwaest@chromium.org === Hi verwaest@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Toon Verwaest Commit : 885f0bc4a77692e5aa3b2c0cad0c9f5b3ada3796 Date : Fri Mar 24 14:37:29 2017 Subject: [csa] Support typed arrays in Has(Own)Property Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_news/load_news_hackernews Change : 0.47% | 2157213.14286 -> 2167349.77778 Revision Result N chromium@459475 2157213 +- 25527.0 14 good chromium@459483 2157082 +- 20785.2 9 good chromium@459487 2157087 +- 20757.7 9 good chromium@459488 2155228 +- 19201.6 6 good chromium@459488,v8@f12b193df9 2159279 +- 19227.0 6 good chromium@459488,v8@6141f6e216 2166096 +- 20730.3 9 good chromium@459488,v8@565829f580 2165980 +- 25533.2 14 good chromium@459488,v8@885f0bc4a7 2167875 +- 29980.6 21 bad <-- chromium@459488,v8@dae6e43d38 2168673 +- 21753.4 14 bad chromium@459489 2169204 +- 15667.7 9 bad chromium@459491 2169208 +- 15719.5 9 bad chromium@459506 2167087 +- 32464.2 21 bad chromium@459536 2168667 +- 21777.4 14 bad chromium@459597 2167350 +- 20785.2 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.news.hackernews system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983677739632607568 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5718028433489920 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jun 8 2017
,
Jun 8 2017
Kinda looks like it should have bisected in between these: chromium@459488,v8@f12b193df9 2159279 +- 19227.0 6 good chromium@459488,v8@6141f6e216 2166096 +- 20730.3 9 good <- bad? I'll restart it.
,
Jun 8 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977345685145043648
,
Jun 8 2017
That's what it seems like to me indeed, but then again, there are revisions around that revision that weren't measured; and it seems unlikely that that particular version caused this increase (even though it does increase memory usage somewhat).
,
Jun 8 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_taobao Change : 1.12% | 35538981.7778 -> 35938011.1111 Suspected Commit Range 16 commits in range Mismatching LKGR/FKBR depots, unable to provide handy url. good_revision: v8@f12b193df9134ba3a1ef565a8c799f19060205af bad_revision : chromium@c6aafdcefd3e6c7abcdc205d46c0c2a3e0c8be58 Revision Result N chromium@459450 35538982 +- 1464432 9 good chromium@459470 35523008 +- 1019837 6 good chromium@459480 35779612 +- 322131 6 good chromium@459485 35797281 +- 318607 6 good chromium@459487 35764269 +- 271684 6 good chromium@459488 35087532 +- 1043859 5 good chromium@459488,v8@f12b193df9 34853296 +- 495785 11 good chromium@459488,v8@dc00a1216f --- --- build failure --- --- --- too many build failures to list chromium@459488,v8@417c83c1b1 --- --- build failure chromium@459489 35554521 +- 2240910 11 bad chromium@459528 35938011 +- 1172870 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.taobao system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977345685145043648 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6510211616997376 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@chromium.org
, Mar 30 2017