Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
42% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 460197:460236 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 30 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983708433717785088
,
Mar 30 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : GC:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_cnn Revision Result N chromium@460196 5817.85 +- 1911.95 21 good chromium@460236 5811.74 +- 1808.46 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.cnn v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983708433717785088 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5537037437894656 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 30 2017
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982612024734984416 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tebbi@chromium.org
, Mar 30 2017