New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 706710 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Apr 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Windows
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

version57 can not GC

Reported by tmt0...@gmail.com, Mar 30 2017

Issue description

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/57.0.2987.133 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. run 500* up to do cloneNode() or  jQuery.clone()
2. Observe the memory state
3. 

What is the expected behavior?
The amount of memory is low

What went wrong?
maybe do cloneNode,
then chrome can not GC memory

Did this work before? Yes 56

Chrome version: 57.0.2987.133  Channel: stable
OS Version: 10.0
Flash Version: Shockwave Flash 25.0 r0

in version 56 , it's not happend
 

Comment 1 by tmt0...@gmail.com, Mar 30 2017

Attach file is my test code
clone.html
846 bytes View Download
cloneTest.js
1.1 KB View Download
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
91.9 KB View Download
Cc: rbasuvula@chromium.org
Labels: Needs-Feedback
Tested in chrome # 57.0.2987.133 and Canary #59.0.3056.0 on win 10.0 and not able to reproduce the issue.Please find the screen shots for your reference.
Observations: Compared to M56 amount of memory is low M57.

@Reporter: Could you please let me know if i have missed anything and if possible, Please create new profile without extensions and apps.Re-check once and let us know the observations of the issue which would help us to triage the issue further.

Thanks in Advance.
706710(56).PNG
195 KB View Download
706710(M57).PNG
248 KB View Download
Components: -Blink Blink>JavaScript
Do your pictures not show that the memory requirements for M57 are less than M56?
Yes! the memory consumption is less than M-56 while compared to M-57.

Thank you!
Labels: Needs-Triage-M57
Status: WontFix (was: Unconfirmed)
Closing according to #2

Sign in to add a comment