New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 706305 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

27.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic at 458862:459069

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Mar 29 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, Mar 29 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=706305

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg7KC2owoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac12-mini-8gb
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-scavenger_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458861      5.88833 +- 4.15271      21      good
chromium@459069      5.756 +- 5.11251        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983804405524425024

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6390782447058944


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 4 by u...@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Labels: Performance-Sheriff-V8
Project Member

Comment 5 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 21 2017

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Project Member

Comment 8 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 25 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_12_mini_8gb_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : Compile:duration_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458861      1025.15 +- 379.236      21      good
chromium@459069      1049.25 +- 303.591      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973097290965664896


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 9 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 25 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Closing as not reproducible.
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 25 2017

Cc: ksakamoto@chromium.org
Owner: ksakamoto@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author ksakamoto@chromium.org ===

Hi ksakamoto@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the
results.


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : ksakamoto
  Commit : 3246896976ad46a095ef679b2421528536848059
  Date   : Thu Mar 23 09:28:28 2017
  Subject: Shorten the network 2-quiet window of FirstMeaningfulPaintDetector

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_search/browse_search_google
  Change       : 12.82% | 99.2043333333 -> 111.920857143

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@459028      99.2043 +- 72.8436      21      good
chromium@459029      86.8987 +- 19.0444      6       good
chromium@459030      115.035 +- 18.1966      21      bad       <--
chromium@459031      113.271 +- 20.6341      21      bad
chromium@459033      114.413 +- 23.4671      14      bad
chromium@459038      117.203 +- 23.7176      9       bad
chromium@459047      113.207 +- 17.6078      21      bad
chromium@459065      113.728 +- 24.323       21      bad
chromium@459102      111.921 +- 30.6393      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.search.google v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop_classic

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8973097283632894000


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Sign in to add a comment