New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 706302 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3466.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 456187:459131

Project Member Reported by ulan@google.com, Mar 29 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by ulan@google.com, Mar 29 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=706302

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgrJr6pAsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac11-air
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 29 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-start_sum/browse_news/browse_news_cnn

Revision             Result                      N
chromium@456186      0.0668333 +- 0.0198704      6      good
chromium@459131      4.48 +- 0.0                 1      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.cnn v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983804611571136784

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5509798218432512


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_air_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop
  Metric       : v8-gc-incremental-start_sum/browse_news/browse_news_cnn

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@456186      0.0798 +- 0.0181879      5      good
chromium@459131      4.4685 +- 0.385784       4      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.cnn v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982612126919058480

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5509798218432512


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Comment 6 by u...@chromium.org, May 12 2017

Labels: Performance-Sheriff-V8

Comment 7 by u...@chromium.org, Jul 11 2017

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Bisect bot cannot reproduce the regression and the absolute value of the regression is small (even though the percentage is large).

Sign in to add a comment