Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.3% regression in blink_perf.layout at 459137:459315 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983986757103014512
,
Mar 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983981566186751040
,
Mar 27 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author stkhapugin@chromium.org === Hi stkhapugin@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : stkhapugin Commit : 3da3338bfc027c0b7a48e5b033feb04f24792b17 Date : Thu Mar 23 16:19:51 2017 Subject: [ObjC ARC] Converts ios/chrome/browser/ui/omnibox:omnibox_internal to ARC. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : long-line-nowrap-spans-collapse/long-line-nowrap-spans-collapse Change : 0.74% | 26.6364444444 -> 26.8347777778 Revision Result N chromium@459044 26.6364 +- 0.303862 9 good chromium@459099 26.6057 +- 0.378735 9 good chromium@459106 26.6676 +- 0.377186 14 good chromium@459107 26.961 +- 0.263473 6 bad <-- chromium@459109 27.0495 +- 0.122325 6 bad chromium@459110 26.7746 +- 0.313498 14 bad chromium@459113 26.8996 +- 0.272349 9 bad chromium@459126 26.8264 +- 0.423577 14 bad chromium@459153 26.8348 +- 0.410124 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983981566186751040 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5292489918906368 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 28 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author xiaochengh@chromium.org === Hi xiaochengh@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : xiaochengh Commit : d53a04e0ac4ab58cb1bc499de297afeae9ba6bac Date : Thu Mar 23 23:51:05 2017 Subject: List missing header files in editing/BUILD.gn Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : long-line-nowrap-collapse/long-line-nowrap-collapse Change : 6.33% | 25.9276428571 -> 27.5647857143 Revision Result N chromium@459136 25.9276 +- 2.3817 14 good chromium@459226 25.9361 +- 1.83992 14 good chromium@459271 25.7236 +- 1.28986 9 good chromium@459282 25.8443 +- 2.02308 14 good chromium@459283 28.0602 +- 2.61519 6 bad <-- chromium@459284 26.5039 +- 1.98271 14 bad chromium@459285 26.4143 +- 2.75489 21 bad chromium@459287 26.5274 +- 2.43067 14 bad chromium@459293 26.3649 +- 2.02349 14 bad chromium@459315 27.5648 +- 4.38366 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983986757103014512 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6183005082615808 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 28 2017
My CL only changes BUILD.gn and cannot possibly affect performance.
,
Mar 28 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983889295704964992
,
Mar 28 2017
kicked off another bisect just in case
,
Mar 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : long-line-nowrap-collapse/long-line-nowrap-collapse Revision Result N chromium@459136 27.7059 +- 5.36225 21 good chromium@459315 28.455 +- 10.9779 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983889295704964992 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6467563040538624 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 29 2017
regression looks not significant in these bisect results. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Mar 27 2017