All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=705401

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgrIK3sgkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983986961994269808

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.cnn.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458714      232.829 +- 12.9881      21      good
chromium@458826      232.107 +- 11.2571      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.cnn.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983986961994269808

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5621637421989888


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983981375632936032

another bisect with a wider range

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.cnn.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458622      232.247 +- 21.0329      21      good
chromium@459118      232.013 +- 12.5367      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.cnn.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983981375632936032

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5796617476636672


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983905383346635520

kicked off another bisect with a wider range including earlier revisions that could show good results of ~220

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.cnn.com

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458380      232.464 +- 13.9031      21      good
chromium@458826      232.684 +- 10.5247      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.cnn.com page_cycler_v2.basic_oopif

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983905383346635520

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5906072570691584


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982611783118366480

Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982580630672273024