Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.5% regression in blink_perf.dom at 458380:458522 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983990360270157552
,
Mar 27 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author jfernandez@igalia.com === Hi jfernandez@igalia.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : jfernandez Commit : 7b60b0148294aa25648798b20bb527097c800baf Date : Tue Mar 21 13:21:15 2017 Subject: [css-align] Import the CSS Box Alignment tests from the CSSWG Test Suite Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : select-multiple-add/select-multiple-add Change : 3.30% | 4768.27531545 -> 4615.24116505 Revision Result N chromium@458379 4768.28 +- 67.3395 14 good chromium@458385 4819.6 +- 46.6334 6 good chromium@458386 4745.2 +- 39.5127 6 bad <-- chromium@458387 4752.58 +- 26.0972 6 bad chromium@458388 4744.34 +- 107.072 14 bad chromium@458397 4742.08 +- 82.9815 9 bad chromium@458415 4739.99 +- 74.7599 9 bad chromium@458451 4676.8 +- 427.231 9 bad chromium@458522 4615.24 +- 470.211 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983990360270157552 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5208560083927040 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 27 2017
The CL 7b60b0148294aa25648798b20bb527097c800bafis just an import of some WPT tests, so it doesn't change any line of code. I don't see how how it may cause any performance regression.
,
Mar 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983963152342743008
,
Mar 27 2017
The metric seems to bump down over two runs. Kicked off a bisect on a wider range.
,
Mar 27 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : rune Commit : df2ef06a75aae87d449e2f801e90fd418679871b Date : Tue Mar 21 22:13:56 2017 Subject: Updating :in-range should not rely on validation. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : select-multiple-add/select-multiple-add Change : 19.39% | 4771.88918425 -> 3846.73358564 Revision Result N chromium@458379 4771.89 +- 24.373 6 good chromium@458500 4759.12 +- 44.0726 6 good chromium@458561 4686.82 +- 146.706 6 good chromium@458569 4696.12 +- 90.7043 6 good chromium@458573 4683.87 +- 87.1598 6 good chromium@458575 4696.93 +- 41.8497 6 good chromium@458576 3834.53 +- 160.092 6 bad <-- chromium@458591 3840.79 +- 52.9744 6 bad chromium@458621 3846.73 +- 31.5771 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983963152342743008 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5239262926077952 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Mar 27 2017