Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.4%-34.6% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ko_th_vi at 456562:456784 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 27 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983991479094163824
,
Mar 27 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed unexpectedly
Bisect was aborted with the following:
Step('Check bisect finished on revision chromium@456690,v8@d80c92bb60.fetch file d80c92bb602288bc35cecbf63b43ee7f9a8edd08:DEPS') failed with return_code 1
Bisect Details
Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect
Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.typical_25
Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-cold/http___arstechnica.com_
Revision Result N
chromium@456646 1004.11 +- 924.056 14 good
chromium@456670 1002.89 +- 605.95 14 good
chromium@456681 1026.91 +- 1025.58 21 good
chromium@456684 935.723 +- 445.399 14 good
chromium@456690 981.015 +- 522.474 14 good
chromium@456690,v8@8e18765d69 1006.02 +- 612.258 14 good
chromium@456690,v8@d80c92bb60 996.606 +- 645.829 14 good
chromium@456691 1193.18 +- 745.965 14 bad
To Run This Test
src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...arstechnica.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25
Debug Info
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983991479094163824
Is this bisect wrong?
https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5322678707159040
| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
| X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 28 2017
noise
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982620118108334736 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Mar 27 2017