Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.7%-109.1% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 458375:458546 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 23 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984290742332166992
,
Mar 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___kakaku.com_ Revision Result N chromium@458374 123.541 +- 33.0179 21 good chromium@458501 129.672 +- 46.4239 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kakaku.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984290742332166992 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5235224314642432 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984282303605172736
,
Mar 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___goo.ne.jp_ Revision Result N chromium@458303 459.25 +- 97.0608 21 good chromium@458501 447.779 +- 113.738 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...goo.ne.jp. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984282303605172736 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5802545202593792 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651543824194928
,
Apr 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___kakaku.com_ Revision Result N chromium@458374 127.772 +- 38.9409 21 good chromium@458501 123.199 +- 29.5979 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kakaku.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651543824194928 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5235224314642432 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982580343787138976
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Mar 23 2017