New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 704741 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

5.7%-109.1% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh at 458375:458546

Project Member Reported by jasontiller@chromium.org, Mar 23 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 24 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___kakaku.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458374      123.541 +- 33.0179      21      good
chromium@458501      129.672 +- 46.4239      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kakaku.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984290742332166992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5235224314642432


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 24 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___goo.ne.jp_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458303      459.25 +- 97.0608       21      good
chromium@458501      447.779 +- 113.738      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...goo.ne.jp. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984282303605172736

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5802545202593792


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 11 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_zen_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___kakaku.com_

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@458374      127.772 +- 38.9409      21      good
chromium@458501      123.199 +- 29.5979      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...kakaku.com. page_cycler_v2.intl_ja_zh

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982651543824194928

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5235224314642432


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. 

Sign in to add a comment