Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.6% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 458417:458450 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 23 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984376853317120544
,
Mar 23 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author mvstanton@chromium.org === Hi mvstanton@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : mvstanton Commit : 1e03479c64ab3dc41182f4d7017b1fb39ceffb27 Date : Tue Mar 21 08:56:56 2017 Subject: [builtins] Array.prototype.filter implemented as a TurboFan code stub. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_games/load_games_lazors Change : 1.47% | 2179160.0 -> 2211252.0 Revision Result N chromium@458416 2179160 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@458433 2176307 +- 15190.2 6 good chromium@458438 2179080 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@458440 2179080 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@458441 2179080 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@458441,v8@25f86ffea5 2179080 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@458441,v8@48e08319ca 2176838 +- 15155.4 6 good chromium@458441,v8@ed93e7c27b 2179644 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@458441,v8@1e03479c64 2211259 +- 40.1663 6 bad <-- chromium@458441,v8@6ec45d7495 2211252 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@458442 2211259 +- 40.1663 6 bad chromium@458450 2211252 +- 0.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.lazors system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984376853317120544 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5781733670125568 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
Explictly assigning. A CL you landed tripped one of the speed metrics we measure in the lab. If this is the first time this has happened to one of your CLs, or if it's been a while, please read: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/addressing_performance_regressions.md We're looking for one of the following: 1. Justification via explanation 2. Plan to revert or fix 3. Angry rage throwing of equipment at my head Just be aware that I'm trained in trumpet playing and First Aid and am not afraid to use it. Note: This was a bulk edit message and not very personal.
,
Sep 14 2017
Actual regression reproduced here is 35kib, smaller than our threshold for alerting. The graphs are really up and down, so I don't think there's a real regression here. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Mar 23 2017