Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
32.2% regression in loading.mobile at 457800:457894 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 22 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984380978598349424
,
Mar 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.mobile Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/Regular-3G/https___www.google.com.br_search?q_flor_q_Entrega+de+flores_start_10 Revision Result N chromium@457799 1133.69 +- 508.083 21 good chromium@457894 1131.29 +- 659.403 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...www.google.com.br.search.q.flor.q.Entrega.de.flores.start.10 loading.mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984380978598349424 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5856009223929856 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by jasontiller@chromium.org
, Mar 22 2017