New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 703771 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 697879
Owner: ----
Closed: Mar 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

4.8%-4.9% regression in v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2 at 454593:455036

Project Member Reported by tdres...@chromium.org, Mar 21 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=703771

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgzLmcugoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgzIHTuQkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 22 2017

Mergedinto: 697879
Status: Duplicate (was: Untriaged)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Toon Verwaest
  Commit : 6477f0777f57736411a02837301451ffb0e349ff
  Date   : Tue Feb 28 14:08:05 2017
  Subject: [api] Mark api prototypes as prototype before configuring them

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:allocated_objects_size_max/tumblr
  Change       : 4.78% | 58187586.6667 -> 60969020.0

Revision                           Result                   N
chromium@454592                    58187587 +- 254583       6      good
chromium@454707                    58346589 +- 1085720      6      good
chromium@454764                    58210959 +- 113913       6      good
chromium@454790                    58574015 +- 1312546      6      good
chromium@454792                    58396187 +- 964580       6      good
chromium@454793                    58161177 +- 162523       6      good
chromium@454793,v8@2362f869a4      58474416 +- 174377       6      good
chromium@454793,v8@08d84f6d23      58488176 +- 111301       6      good
chromium@454793,v8@a5dfa06213      58518260 +- 130422       6      good
chromium@454793,v8@6477f0777f      60813575 +- 772848       6      bad       <--
chromium@454793,v8@a35616e324      60793209 +- 784976       6      bad
chromium@454793,v8@a6b20adbf9      61055011 +- 1916653      6      bad
chromium@454793,v8@59c9e6ff69      60736617 +- 429601       6      bad
chromium@454794                    61263136 +- 1838895      6      bad
chromium@454798                    60763264 +- 854294       6      bad
chromium@454806                    60667364 +- 81311.2      6      bad
chromium@454821                    60790068 +- 502935       6      bad
chromium@455036                    60969020 +- 1187565      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tumblr v8.infinite_scroll_tbmv2

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984485248727217712

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5232737327251456


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment