Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 457022:457050 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984591645981929184
,
Mar 20 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect was unable to run to completion Error: INFRA_FAILURE The bisect was able to narrow the range, you can try running with: good_revision: 7599eb3eee0daef81cef0bdf79294849b5d52e6d bad_revision : 59e93059c5418474c88680fb71020bf1fb417d2b If failures persist contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yandex Revision Result N chromium@457021 8096599 +- 7776.97 6 good chromium@457036 8094445 +- 4657.59 6 good chromium@457043 8092369 +- 4211.43 6 good chromium@457050 8130087 +- 6620.03 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yandex system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984591645981929184 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6210299130019840 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984571529067596480
,
Mar 20 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : delphick Commit : 9d780d130566384f6aff63f127e92340f31a815d Date : Wed Mar 15 10:45:27 2017 Subject: Ensure the scheduler always changes from UseCase LOADING to NONE. Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search/load_search_yandex Change : 0.44% | 8093269.33333 -> 8128818.66667 Revision Result N chromium@457043 8093269 +- 11245.0 6 good chromium@457047 8093853 +- 8404.58 6 good chromium@457048 8093376 +- 1777.55 6 good chromium@457049 8133615 +- 13642.5 6 bad <-- chromium@457050 8128819 +- 15078.5 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.search.yandex system_health.memory_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984571529067596480 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6371661588201472 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tdres...@chromium.org
, Mar 20 2017