Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
75.1% regression in blink_perf.paint at 455056:455132 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984861133219941136
,
Mar 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.paint Metric : transform-changes/transform-changes Revision Result N chromium@455055 218.155 +- 31.3676 21 good chromium@455132 218.443 +- 49.4657 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.paint Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984861133219941136 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5505115647115264 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982612136242905552
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rmcilroy@chromium.org
, Mar 17 2017