Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
32.3%-1442.8% regression in time-to-play for multiple media.tough_video_cases at 456690:456834 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionDozens of tests across windows bots showing similar regression. Revision range matches similar regression in process_delta metric ( Issue 702268 ) for windows bots. Also seeing regression in working set memory metrics in this revision range (and on these bots).
,
Mar 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984938053793428528
,
Mar 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sugoi Commit : 842efc6922b0cd66febd6f36f04318ebf396c184 Date : Tue Mar 14 18:10:39 2017 Subject: Moving SwiftShader from component to bundled library Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.tough_video_cases Metric : time_to_play/tulip2.m4a Change : 1650.13% | 10.9583333333 -> 191.785 Revision Result N chromium@456689 10.9583 +- 1.22969 6 good chromium@456737 10.8017 +- 1.19707 6 good chromium@456761 10.7658 +- 1.80451 6 good chromium@456763 10.8358 +- 1.14161 6 good chromium@456764 152.621 +- 3.97677 6 bad <-- chromium@456767 152.319 +- 3.89375 6 bad chromium@456773 150.17 +- 7.41272 6 bad chromium@456784 191.785 +- 228.379 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984938053793428528 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5868820188626944 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by chcunningham@google.com
, Mar 16 2017