Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
37.6%-54.3% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_turbo at 456679:456713 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984942585166748928
,
Mar 16 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_turbo Metric : v8-gc-scavenger_avg/browse_news/browse_news_nytimes Revision Result N chromium@456678 15.4886 +- 19.813 21 good chromium@456713 17.0124 +- 19.152 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.nytimes v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile_turbo Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984942585166748928 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6659990208643072 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Mar 17 2017
Revert of previously landed CL. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hpayer@google.com
, Mar 16 2017