New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 701907 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

5.2% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he at 456303:456305

Project Member Reported by nzolghadr@chromium.org, Mar 15 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=701907

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDgtMy6pgsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 15 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.startimes.com_f.aspx

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@456302      160.528 +- 26.9613      21      good
chromium@456305      163.46 +- 16.1879       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.startimes.com.f.aspx page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985030605497194832

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4970685752934400


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Apr 10 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he
  Metric       : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.startimes.com_f.aspx

Revision             Result                 N
chromium@456302      147.52 +- 13.3026      21      good
chromium@456305      148.012 +- 16.604      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.startimes.com.f.aspx page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982667463193583248

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4970685752934400


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment