Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.9% regression in page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he at 456310:456329 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985030767089346384
,
Mar 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : meade Commit : 3a001533b29c0fe28f2354285b2c2ac8d57d8ce6 Date : Mon Mar 13 05:26:20 2017 Subject: Un-DCHECK-guard ThreadRestrictionVerifier for strings. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64ati_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.startimes.com_f.aspx Change : 4.29% | 150.551999993 -> 158.094555557 Revision Result N chromium@456309 150.552 +- 8.68717 9 good chromium@456319 152.703 +- 8.44334 9 good chromium@456322 151.263 +- 6.68624 6 good chromium@456323 157.33 +- 4.42965 6 bad <-- chromium@456324 158.692 +- 1.90341 6 bad chromium@456329 158.095 +- 8.53669 9 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.startimes.com.f.aspx page_cycler_v2.intl_ar_fa_he Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985030767089346384 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5279543025205248 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Mar 15 2017