Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.5% regression in page_cycler_v2.typical_25 at 456316:456339 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985031065635161952
,
Mar 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : meade Commit : 3a001533b29c0fe28f2354285b2c2ac8d57d8ce6 Date : Mon Mar 13 05:26:20 2017 Subject: Un-DCHECK-guard ThreadRestrictionVerifier for strings. Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___www.fifa.com_ Change : 6.67% | 146.206833343 -> 155.957799983 Revision Result N chromium@456315 146.207 +- 1.61624 6 good chromium@456321 147.068 +- 4.01429 6 good chromium@456322 147.521 +- 2.8917 6 good chromium@456323 154.821 +- 0.895786 5 bad <-- chromium@456324 154.551 +- 3.27859 6 bad chromium@456327 154.082 +- 4.17012 6 bad chromium@456339 155.958 +- 1.98607 5 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.fifa.com. page_cycler_v2.typical_25 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985031065635161952 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5871332207624192 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Mar 15 2017