Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 456679:456713 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985044085020815408
,
Mar 16 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author eholk@chromium.org === Hi eholk@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : eholk Commit : 118c376fcbe483b155eec26f8d9192f8cb4b4721 Date : Mon Mar 13 22:12:23 2017 Subject: [wasm] Initial signal handler Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/background/after_http_www_baidu_com_s_word_google Change : 0.82% | 3982156.0 -> 4014853.33333 Revision Result N chromium@456678 3982156 +- 16415.0 6 good chromium@456687 3979343 +- 14028.7 6 good chromium@456690 3977908 +- 12309.9 6 good chromium@456690,v8@118c376fcb 4019669 +- 581.712 6 bad <-- chromium@456690,v8@3800ba6cc7 4019671 +- 635.929 6 bad chromium@456690,v8@97254b0d23 4028192 +- 21178.2 6 bad chromium@456690,v8@f20261bfb4 4011679 +- 9120.8 6 bad chromium@456691 4017348 +- 7389.56 6 bad chromium@456692 4016159 +- 9170.79 6 bad chromium@456696 4017368 +- 14050.0 6 bad chromium@456713 4014853 +- 9982.42 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests memory.top_10_mobile Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985044085020815408 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6098408873394176 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
Explictly assigning. A CL you landed tripped one of the speed metrics we measure in the lab. If this is the first time this has happened to one of your CLs, or if it's been a while, please read: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/addressing_performance_regressions.md We're looking for one of the following: 1. Justification via explanation 2. Plan to revert or fix 3. Angry rage throwing of equipment at my head Just be aware that I'm trained in trumpet playing and First Aid and am not afraid to use it. Note: This was a bulk edit message and not very personal.
,
Sep 14 2017
These are all less than 100kib, from before we had thresholds on our monitoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Mar 15 2017