Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11% regression in page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif at 456321:456345 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985125444895430400
,
Mar 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : meade Commit : 3a001533b29c0fe28f2354285b2c2ac8d57d8ce6 Date : Mon Mar 13 05:26:20 2017 Subject: Un-DCHECK-guard ThreadRestrictionVerifier for strings. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Metric : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/pcv1-warm/http___booking.com Change : 8.42% | 93.7355714286 -> 99.6438333367 Revision Result N chromium@456320 93.7356 +- 18.6824 14 good chromium@456322 93.047 +- 10.4348 9 good chromium@456323 99.2606 +- 18.6345 14 bad <-- chromium@456327 98.5005 +- 16.2646 14 bad chromium@456333 96.7346 +- 9.77247 9 bad chromium@456345 99.6438 +- 9.12941 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...booking.com page_cycler_v2_site_isolation.basic_oopif Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985125444895430400 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5857695283806208 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Mar 14 2017