Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
15.7% regression in blink_perf.layout at 456130:456261 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985135573509174400
,
Mar 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : hindi-line-layout/hindi-line-layout Revision Result N chromium@456129 261.11 +- 31.6581 21 good chromium@456261 259.641 +- 21.5142 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985135573509174400 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5831705899827200 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nzolghadr@chromium.org
, Mar 14 2017