New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 701105 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

16.1% regression in smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases at 455647:455719

Project Member Reported by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=701105

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1JqJ-QoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/https___testdrive-archive.azurewebsites.net_performance_chalkboard_

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@455646      21.3171 +- 1.31313       21      good
chromium@455719      21.3041 +- 0.888805      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...testdrive.archive.azurewebsites.net.performance.chalkboard. smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985201930555918608

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4930490697515008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 23 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/https___testdrive-archive.azurewebsites.net_performance_chalkboard_

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@455646      21.2775 +- 0.876296      21      good
chromium@455719      21.3396 +- 0.793747      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...testdrive.archive.azurewebsites.net.performance.chalkboard. smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984378601832294400

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4930490697515008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 24 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/https___testdrive-archive.azurewebsites.net_performance_chalkboard_

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@455646      21.2507 +- 0.756033      21      good
chromium@455719      21.323 +- 0.838773       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...testdrive.archive.azurewebsites.net.performance.chalkboard. smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8984280327571270880

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4930490697515008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 31 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases
  Metric       : frame_times/https___testdrive-archive.azurewebsites.net_performance_chalkboard_

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@455646      21.3026 +- 0.881115      21      good
chromium@455719      21.316 +- 0.843814       21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=https...testdrive.archive.azurewebsites.net.performance.chalkboard. smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8983641938384182528

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=4930490697515008


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment