Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
17.4% regression in power.gpu_rasterization.top_10 at 455647:455719 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Mar 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985202063681038960
,
Mar 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_retina_perf_bisect Benchmark : power.gpu_rasterization.top_10 Metric : idle_wakeups_total/idle_wakeups_total Revision Result N chromium@455646 245.292 +- 33.4974 21 good chromium@455719 246.042 +- 20.308 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests power.gpu_rasterization.top_10 Debug Info https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985202063681038960 Is this bisect wrong? https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861777918656512 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection. Thank you!
,
Jul 27 2017
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hjd@chromium.org
, Mar 13 2017