New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 700969 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.7% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 456011:456048

Project Member Reported by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=700969

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgIDg1MiFwAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel

Comment 4 by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

I kicked off two bisects, one for the second spike (with the alert) and one for the first.
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@456010      17.0618 +- 0.937285      21      good
chromium@456048      17.0219 +- 0.892368      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985217535278851216

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5777205717630976


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.top_25_smooth
  Metric       : frame_times/http___www.youtube.com

Revision             Result                    N
chromium@455055      16.8458 +- 0.0177107      21      good
chromium@455781      16.846 +- 0.014923        21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...www.youtube.com smoothness.top_25_smooth

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985217481297906912

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6114242001895424


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment