New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 700944 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: Jul 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

53.5%-83.7% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 455056:455915

Project Member Reported by hjd@chromium.org, Mar 13 2017

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Mar 13 2017


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.common_desktop
  Metric       : timeToFirstContentfulPaint_avg/load_tools/load_tools_gmail

Revision             Result                  N
chromium@455055      1264.42 +- 1072.44      21      good
chromium@455915      1300.17 +- 370.321      21      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.tools.gmail system_health.common_desktop

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8985223123247333136

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5472409672482816


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
This alert was found before M-60 branched. Closing as WontFix as this is believed to either be invalid or non-reproducible.

Sign in to add a comment